This page is the short version. It exists because there is a lot to read and you should not have to guess where to start. Five minutes here, then the last section routes you to whichever brief matches the problem you actually have.
The edge got built one problem at a time. Subscribers needed terminating, so you bought a BNG. IPv4 ran out, so you bought CGNAT. Attacks arrived, so you bought scrubbing. Someone complained about gaming latency, so you bought a QoS box. Every one of those is a separate purchase, a separate rack unit, a separate thing to upgrade at 2am, and a separate place for traffic to be copied, queued and delayed.
PPPoE and IPoE termination, RADIUS with CoA, per-plan policy, Q-in-Q. The BNG functions you are replacing, without the chassis.
Port-block allocation that does not drop live connections, deterministic reverse lookup for abuse complaints, and full-cone behaviour that does not break gaming or RTC.
BCP38 anti-spoof validated on every packet, DDoS protection in the data plane rather than a separate scrubber, and abuse containment that blocks the attack rather than the customer.
Per-subscriber and hierarchical shaping, VLAN groups, application-aware treatment — enforced at line rate in the same pass as everything else.
L4S dual-queue AQM and Interactive Flow Protection, so calls, games and ACKs stay fast while the line is saturated. This is the complaint your NOC cannot currently answer.
Native dual-stack, prefix delegation, DS-Lite, MAP-E/MAP-T and NAT64 — four engines in one datapath, so you can stop buying IPv4 per subscriber.
The data plane is half of it. The other half is that somebody has to run this at 3am. NOC2 is the operations platform that comes with the gateways: one console for the fleet, subscriber triage that answers is it them, their line, or us, alerting ranked by who is actually affected rather than by which box is loudest, a wall-board for the NOC, and a public status page for your customers.
The honest comparison is not licence against licence — it is total edge against total edge, because consolidation is where the money is. Fewer boxes means less rack, less power, fewer spares, fewer upgrade windows and fewer support contracts.
| Approach | Hardware | Software / licence | Rack & boxes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Router appliances e.g. MikroTik CCR2216 fleet |
~US$2,200–2,800 each ~$37–45k for ~16 units |
RouterOS included | ~18U · ~19 boxes |
| Carrier chassis Cisco ASR 9000, Nokia 7750 SR |
Six-figure chassis plus line cards; price on application | Per-feature licensing plus an annual support contract | Chassis + spares |
| BNGSOFT | ~$2.5k (1U, 10G) to ~$9k (2U, 200G) ~$0.14–0.37 per subscriber |
Per quote — ask us by email | 3U · 3 boxes |
There is no price list here because there is no useful single number — it depends on subscriber count, which functions you turn on, and whether you are replacing one box or an estate. Tell us those three things and you get a real figure back, not a range.
Send subscriber count, peak throughput and which functions you need. We will size the build, quote the licence, and tell you what hardware to buy from whoever you normally buy hardware from.
Email sales@bngsoft.com for a quoteEvery vendor claims performance. The difference is whether the claim states its method well enough for you to reproduce it or catch it being wrong. Three we publish in full:
Measured with PPPoE, CGNAT, hQoS and ACLs all enabled — 33.6 Gbps at 64-byte frames, the hardest test there is. Most datasheets quote a headline Gbps and omit the frame size, which makes the figure unfalsifiable.
What a real subscriber actually consumes at peak, measured on production gateways rather than assumed. 80% of measured gateways fall between 2.66 and 3.65 Mbps — which is the number your sizing should use.
Running on a decade-old box, with headroom left. Included because it is the least flattering framing we could publish and it still holds.
There are more than eighty briefs behind this page. You do not need most of them. Pick the one that matches the problem you came here with: